Thursday, May 9, 2019

Thrasymachus and Justice in Plato's Political Philosophy Research Paper

Thrasymachus and Justice in Platos Political philosophical system - Research Paper ExampleDistinguished casuist of ancient Greece Thrasymachus has elucidated the term justice tour immersion into discussion on the same topic with great philosopher Socrates, which has been elaborated by Socrates renowned disciple Plato in his Republic. Book I of the Republic encompasses the debate between Thrasymachus and Socrates, where the former makes two assertions about justice. At first, he declares the nonion as mere the advantage of the strong over the rachitic and secondly he views justice as take onting to the prevailing statutes of the state law. (Hourani, 111) The powerful governments, according to Thrasymachus, strive to implement their policies by dint of the force they jollify in comparison with the weaker states consequently, the policy is expected to be observed and followed by all the weak nations. As a result, it becomes the law, which is unconditionally and unanimously imita ted by all. Consequently, it is equally beneficial for the weaker due to the very reality that it would be obeyed by all the weak without discrimination, and hence will become a law for all individuals. The sophist in addition argues that justice imposes unnecessary restrains on the human desires, and thus it does not turn out to be advantageous for the majority of the people in general. Hence, on the one side, Thrasymachus defines justice as the exploitation of the weak individual(s) or stratum at the hands of the powerful and on the other side, he declares it as the invariable of the uniform law, which looks at everyone on the foundations of equality and impartiality. Thus, stronger group signifies the elite or ruling stratum of society, while the weak piece of ass be compared to the masses at large. Since the stronger stratum not only articulates the rules and laws, but also abides the same rules it has devised for all, these statutes of law are supportive for the protection of the rights of the weaker too. Somehow, Socrates points out contradiction in the very definition of justice Thrasymachus has developed. Consequently, it invites criticism from Socrates because of the contradiction it contains in its very scope. Socrates, during his cross examination of the very arguments made by Thrasymachus, vehemently refutes the validity of his viewpoint. He is of the opinion that since the individuals, even from the strong and ruling classes, are humans, and hence can make mistakes, they cannot be expected to devise error turn laws, policies and strategies. On the other hand, even their nearly sincere efforts can maintain flaws and mistakes while devising the laws so these statutes, in the form of advantages and privileges for the stronger, are ineffective to present the real picture of justice in their nature and scope. Somehow, Thrasymachus counters Socrates objection by stating that the rulers are free from making errors or committing mistakes till they are at the helm of the power. And even if they commit they same, there is no one to challenge or point out their mistakes till they are enjoying the position of rulers. In other words, the weaker strata do not have the power to put even the incorrect rules into jeopardy. Consequently, they remain as the laws of the arena till the individuals, introducing the same, are in the power. (Bloom, 25) Being one of the greatest logicians the world has ever produced, Socrates could not submit to the Thrasymachus claim that rules and laws are devised for the benefit of the rulers only. On the other hand, he clarifies his objection with the example that the artwork is created for the consumers and public, and not for the use of the artisan. Similarly, the shopkeeper involves into trade and merchandise by bringing commodities for the people. It is therefore, justice carries advantages for the common man at first, and hence cannot be attributed to the dominant political group only. Socrates also cites the professional abilities and proficiencies of the

No comments:

Post a Comment